For LCA Tejas, it’s now about months, not decades

India’s defence R&D establishment will have to fire on all cylinders to fast-track the meandering Tejas light combat aircraft, which is still not fully operational or combat ready, if it does not want the Mr Narendra Modi government to critically re-examine the entire project. The Tejas project, in fact, may even get some competition in the light-weight fighter category. Defence minister Mr Manohar Parrikar said “some other single-engine, lighter fighter” other than the home-grown Tejas could also be considered for a “Make in India” project to replace the obsolete MiG-21s. Restricting the acquisition of expensive twin-engine French Rafale fighters to just 36 for now, instead of the original plan for 126 MMRCA (medium multi-role combat aircraft), Mr Parrikar stressed he was trying to plug operational gaps in airpower by improving serviceability of “heavy-weight” Sukhoi-30MKIs as well as “pushing” the DRDO-HAL combine to deliver Tejas faster. “Don’t compare Rafale, a top-end fighter, to MiG-21s, which we will phase out in about six to 10 years. The replacement for MiG-21s will be Tejas or some other single-engine, lighter aircraft. Tejas ki maar bhi kaafi hai (Tejas packs a punch) and it’s much better than a MiG-21, but has certain limitations,” said Mr Parrikar. Though some interpreted this to mean impending doom for the Tejas project, a top official dismissed it by clarifying the government was “just keeping all options open” to make “numbers” with IAF down to just 34 fighter squadrons when 44 are needed. “There could be scope for a single-engine fighter, which would be much cheaper than Rafale, somewhere between the capabilities of Rafale and Tejas,” he said.

 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/


Leave Your Comment

Your email will not be published or shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>